So we made a thoroughfare for Freedom and her train, Sixty miles in latitude, three hundred to the main; Treason fled before us, for resistance was in vain, While we were marching through Georgia. We bring the jubilee! The Flag that makes you free!
The Age of Totalitarianism: Stalin and Hitler We live, not feeling the country beneath us, Our speech inaudible ten steps away, But where they're up to half a conversation -- They'll speak of the Kremlin mountain man. His thick fingers are fat like worms, And his words certain as pound weights.
His cockroach How similar were hitler and stalin essay laugh, And the tops of his boots glisten. And all around his rabble of thick-skinned leaders, He plays through services of half-people. Some whistle, some meow, some snivel, He alone merely caterwauls and prods. Like horseshoes he forges decree after decree -- Some get it in the forehead, some in the brow, some in the groin, and some in the eye.
Whatever the execution -- it's a raspberry to him And his Georgian chest is broad. The Age of Anxiety, the age of the lost generation, was also an age in which modern Fascism and Totalitarianism made their appearance on the historical stage.
Byliberal democracies in Britain, France, Scandinavia and Switzerland were realities. But elsewhere across Europe, various kinds of dictators reared their ugly heads.
Dictatorship seemed to be the wave of the future. It also seemed to be the wave of the present.
After all, hadn't Mussolini proclaimed that this century would be a century of the right? It was a nightmare world in which human individuality was subsumed under the might of totalitarian collectivism. The modern totalitarian state rejected liberal values and exercised total control over the lives of its subjects.
How this indeed occurred is the subject of this lecture.
It goes without saying that the governments of Europe had been conservative and anti-democratic throughout their long histories. The leaders of such governments -- whether monarch or autocrat -- WERE the government, and by their very nature, prevented any incidence of social or political change that might endanger the existing social order.
Of course, there have been enlightened monarchs but few of them would have been so enlightened to have removed themselves from the sinews of power.
Before the 19th century these monarchs legitimized their rule by recourse to the divine right theory of kingship, an idea which itself appeared in medieval Europe.
Such was the case in France until the late 18th century when French revolutionaries decided to end the Bourbon claim to the throne by divine right by cutting off the head of Louis XVI. Of course, France ended up with Napoleon who also claimed the divine right of kingship.
Only this time, divine right emanated from Napoleon himself. In the 19th century, it was the dual revolution -- the Industrial and French Revolutions -- which created the forces of social change which monarchs, enlightened or not, could not fail to take heed. A large middle class had made its appearance in the 18th century but lacked status.
Now, in the 19th century, this large class of entrepreneurs, factory owners, civil servants, teachers, lawyers, doctors, merchants and other professionals wanted their voices heard by their governments. They became a force which had to be reckoned with and the government began to utilize its talents by creating large, obedient bureaucracies.
In this way, government seemed to reflect the interests of all when in actual fact, they represented the interests of the bourgeoisie. So European governments maintained order by giving the middle classes a stake in the welfare of the nation. Governments also built strong police forces and armies of loyal soldiers.
Meanwhile, the great mass of people, the "swinish multitude," lay completely unrepresented. And radicals were either imprisoned or exiled because of their liberal, democratic, socialist, communist or anarchist inclinations.
Despite these measures, and there were others as well, traditional authoritarian governments were not completely successful.
Their power and their objectives were limited.What FDR had in common with the other charismatic collectivists of the 30s Three New Deals: Reflections on Roosevelt's America, Mussolini's Italy, and Hitler's Germany, – , by Wolfgang.
Comments. Brother Nathanael April 18, @ pm. Hitler’s most trenchant speech, Freedom Or Slavery, as author John Toland observes, is Hitler’s “reasonable explanation” of Jewry’s power both in Germany, Europe, and in America.
Free Essay: To what extent were Hitler and Stalin similar? Hitler and Stalin were both cruel dictators around the time of WW2, but to what extent were these.
Joseph Stalin (born Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili; 18 December – 5 March ) was a Soviet revolutionary and politician of Georgian ethnicity. He ruled the Soviet Union from the mids until his death in , holding the titles of General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from to and the nation's Premier from to Stalin Web Sites; Lesson Plans, Activities, and more; Stalin Web Sites.
The Internal Workings of the Soviet System Library of Congress Soviet Archives Exhibit, this detailed section covers the Lenin/Stalin . Stalin Many historians consider tyrants - Hitler and Stalin - and their ideologies to be quite similar.
These two despots were the most famous and probably the bloodiest dictators in this period. No wonder these two are compared to one another.